Your case is exactly why such changes were implemented. The initial concerns which prompted the plan changes were company liability- even though you paid technically the transaction was not complete until service was rendered (Ian mentioned this in the second Q&A- it was becoming an issue for server allocation as staff wanted to make sure that you had the capacity to spend skycredits if you wished to [activity restraints were also placed within reason- should you be inactive for more than three months with a good reason you are always free to reach out to support]). I doubt that the company is going to go anywhere anytime soon- they are still working on Enterprise projects for big corporations (the keyword here being that said projects are under NDA, which is why there are very few details about this at the moment [not that staff wouldn’t want to share, but they will only announce things when their partners are ready]).
Consider this your final warning- you have had a history of making uninformed comments before, and I’m afraid we’re at the end of the line in terms of giving you chances: either contribute to discussion in a more informed manner (criticism is fine, as long as it is well made and informed [never hurts to ask a question- but that is something that you don’t ever seem to do}) there will be action taken against you. We are tired of correcting the record for the umpteenth time.